<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loupe or Optvisor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tick Talk &#187; A watchmaker&#8217;s home</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>Tick Talk &#187; A watchmaker&#8217;s home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>[...] 9 square inches directly in front of them. During the repair of a watch I wear a loupe which, as we discussed before requires your face to about 2 inches from your work. Since this is where you spend most of your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9 square inches directly in front of them. During the repair of a watch I wear a loupe which, as we discussed before requires your face to about 2 inches from your work. Since this is where you spend most of your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12069</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12069</guid>
		<description>I work with somebody that uses surgeon's loupes to work on watches all day. The focal distance is amazing, and if I am not mistaken it is upwards of 12". I used them for about 5 minutes and it is nice, will take getting used to, and is very expensive. I am told the model he wears is around $4000 now. He got them for less than that and uses them to help with posture. I wonder if they could keep me from becoming a hunchback...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with somebody that uses surgeon&#8217;s loupes to work on watches all day. The focal distance is amazing, and if I am not mistaken it is upwards of 12&#8243;. I used them for about 5 minutes and it is nice, will take getting used to, and is very expensive. I am told the model he wears is around $4000 now. He got them for less than that and uses them to help with posture. I wonder if they could keep me from becoming a hunchback&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Edwards</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12042</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12042</guid>
		<description>I have seen IWC's Kurt Klaus sporting a pair of what appear to me to be surgeons' loupes before, and he is a veritable master of the trade. So I would say that it's definitely not out of the question, Movery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen IWC&#8217;s Kurt Klaus sporting a pair of what appear to me to be surgeons&#8217; loupes before, and he is a veritable master of the trade. So I would say that it&#8217;s definitely not out of the question, Movery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12037</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12037</guid>
		<description>It's hard to put a finger on it.  I started out with ASCO Loupes. The way things look through the B &amp; L is considerably different and I'm just not used to it.  I haven't tried to analyze what is different about them because I haven't needed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to put a finger on it.  I started out with ASCO Loupes. The way things look through the B &#038; L is considerably different and I&#8217;m just not used to it.  I haven&#8217;t tried to analyze what is different about them because I haven&#8217;t needed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: movery</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12031</link>
		<dc:creator>movery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12031</guid>
		<description>I've always wondered if Surgeon's loupes would be of any use?  Don't know the magnification, but I suspect the focal length would be huge.  Bet they're expensive, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered if Surgeon&#8217;s loupes would be of any use?  Don&#8217;t know the magnification, but I suspect the focal length would be huge.  Bet they&#8217;re expensive, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Edwards</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12030</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12030</guid>
		<description>At work, I use a slightly modified Bausch and Lomb. I vented it and installed a new lens in the main loupe body back when I was in watchmaking school. The thing I like about the B&amp;L is that I can quickly double its magnification, when I want to use it for longer periods of close-up work, by installing the small screw in lens that it came with. For basic inspection, I use an ASCO 10x alpanetique. For inspection of pivots, pinions, and teeth, I use an ASCO 25x. Both of which I am very happy with. The 25x takes some definite getting used to, though.

At home, I mainly use a 4x Ti loupe that I made when I was in school, a generic 10x and a 20x ASCO for inspection. My favourite loupe is a &lt;a href="http://www.jaquet-droz.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Jaquet-Droz&lt;/a&gt;, which was given to me as a gift. It gets about the same amount of wear time as my Ti loupe. 

If you are looking for a good, reasonably-priced, all around loupe, I would recommend &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E4W4GA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=allianhorlog-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000E4W4GA" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bergeon's 4x&lt;/a&gt;. If you want a slightly longer focal length, however, I would recommend &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E4W4GK?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=allianhorlog-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000E4W4GK" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bergeon's 3x&lt;/a&gt;, which will buy you another 1/2". 

I have yet to try a BECO, but from what I have heard, the majority of their products are sourced from Asia and too overpriced for the quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At work, I use a slightly modified Bausch and Lomb. I vented it and installed a new lens in the main loupe body back when I was in watchmaking school. The thing I like about the B&amp;L is that I can quickly double its magnification, when I want to use it for longer periods of close-up work, by installing the small screw in lens that it came with. For basic inspection, I use an ASCO 10x alpanetique. For inspection of pivots, pinions, and teeth, I use an ASCO 25x. Both of which I am very happy with. The 25x takes some definite getting used to, though.</p>
<p>At home, I mainly use a 4x Ti loupe that I made when I was in school, a generic 10x and a 20x ASCO for inspection. My favourite loupe is a <a href="http://www.jaquet-droz.com/" rel="nofollow">Jaquet-Droz</a>, which was given to me as a gift. It gets about the same amount of wear time as my Ti loupe. </p>
<p>If you are looking for a good, reasonably-priced, all around loupe, I would recommend <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E4W4GA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=allianhorlog-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000E4W4GA" rel="nofollow">Bergeon&#8217;s 4x</a>. If you want a slightly longer focal length, however, I would recommend <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E4W4GK?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=allianhorlog-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000E4W4GK" rel="nofollow">Bergeon&#8217;s 3x</a>, which will buy you another 1/2&#8243;. </p>
<p>I have yet to try a BECO, but from what I have heard, the majority of their products are sourced from Asia and too overpriced for the quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12013</guid>
		<description>I use a pair of 2x reading glasses for dis/assembly and a 10x B&amp;L loupe for close up work. I've only used a B&amp;L J. What don't you like about them? Maybe I need a new one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a pair of 2x reading glasses for dis/assembly and a 10x B&amp;L loupe for close up work. I&#8217;ve only used a B&amp;L J. What don&#8217;t you like about them? Maybe I need a new one. <img src='http://watchmakingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Cerullo</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-12004</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cerullo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-12004</guid>
		<description>I use a 5x Bauch &amp; Laume loupe for regular work and a Bergeon 10x if I need to see something really small and if I need to  inspect something, like the teeth on an Accutron index wheel, I use a microscope.

Although most of you know this, I think a lot of people new to this tend to use their loupes improplerly and this may cause them some problems.

When wearing a loupe, you are to keep both eyes open and use your mind to control which eye your are focusing with.  I see a lot of people trying to do the one eye thing and they must get some wicked eye strain.

Also, if fogging is a problem, you can drill a couple of holes in the plastic.

I have often thought of upgrading my loupes to some of the expensive ones, but I'm not sure if there is really much of a difference when used for watch repair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a 5x Bauch &amp; Laume loupe for regular work and a Bergeon 10x if I need to see something really small and if I need to  inspect something, like the teeth on an Accutron index wheel, I use a microscope.</p>
<p>Although most of you know this, I think a lot of people new to this tend to use their loupes improplerly and this may cause them some problems.</p>
<p>When wearing a loupe, you are to keep both eyes open and use your mind to control which eye your are focusing with.  I see a lot of people trying to do the one eye thing and they must get some wicked eye strain.</p>
<p>Also, if fogging is a problem, you can drill a couple of holes in the plastic.</p>
<p>I have often thought of upgrading my loupes to some of the expensive ones, but I&#8217;m not sure if there is really much of a difference when used for watch repair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott W.</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-11994</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-11994</guid>
		<description>Aimeri, Since I wore glasses most of my life, I started out using the loupes that attach to the frames of my glasses.  I switched over to a pair of optivisors, but I really disliked them.  I now wear contacts, and use a Bergeon wire loupe holders with a variety of loupes ranging from 3X to 10X.  When I started using the loupes they would steam up occasionally, I drilled a couple of holes in the side to let air flow through, and now prefer them more than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aimeri, Since I wore glasses most of my life, I started out using the loupes that attach to the frames of my glasses.  I switched over to a pair of optivisors, but I really disliked them.  I now wear contacts, and use a Bergeon wire loupe holders with a variety of loupes ranging from 3X to 10X.  When I started using the loupes they would steam up occasionally, I drilled a couple of holes in the side to let air flow through, and now prefer them more than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimeri</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2009/10/01/loupe-or-optvisor/comment-page-1/#comment-11983</link>
		<dc:creator>aimeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=1185#comment-11983</guid>
		<description>Maurice,
I've found your idea to be particularly interesting. Same magnification I would get with a regular loupe, but all the comfort of the optvisor. I might have to give that a shot. Any particular brand you would like to suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurice,<br />
I&#8217;ve found your idea to be particularly interesting. Same magnification I would get with a regular loupe, but all the comfort of the optvisor. I might have to give that a shot. Any particular brand you would like to suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
