<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All That Glitters&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/10/19/all-that-glitters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/10/19/all-that-glitters/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tick Talk &#187; Myth Bust Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/10/19/all-that-glitters/comment-page-1/#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>Tick Talk &#187; Myth Bust Confirmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=497#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week I mentioned that I would carry out some tests with a fellow watchmaker to confirm whether or not the rose-coloured plating on vintage Omega watches contained any gold, as a follow up to a discussion that sprouted off of this post on the Omega 321. Following are the results from the samples we tested. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week I mentioned that I would carry out some tests with a fellow watchmaker to confirm whether or not the rose-coloured plating on vintage Omega watches contained any gold, as a follow up to a discussion that sprouted off of this post on the Omega 321. Following are the results from the samples we tested. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Edwards</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/10/19/all-that-glitters/comment-page-1/#comment-2800</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=497#comment-2800</guid>
		<description>Great point J.Peter. Definitely a factor to be taken into consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point J.Peter. Definitely a factor to be taken into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/10/19/all-that-glitters/comment-page-1/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/?p=497#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a lot of experience with gold tests but If this is a standard acid test, the plating may not be thick enough to determine whether it is gold or not.  Acid typically burns through non-pure gold plating very fast and begins to work on the underlying metal. Clearly rose gold plating cannot be pure or it would be &quot;gold&quot; colored.  I am looking forward to the results however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a lot of experience with gold tests but If this is a standard acid test, the plating may not be thick enough to determine whether it is gold or not.  Acid typically burns through non-pure gold plating very fast and begins to work on the underlying metal. Clearly rose gold plating cannot be pure or it would be &#8220;gold&#8221; colored.  I am looking forward to the results however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

