<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Parts Issue Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prem</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Prem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Hi Jp,
Making common sense of it all, is the challenge s faced by watchmakers in the 21st century! Maurice Lacroix use, to their own advantage of course, modified ETA movements. These, as you are well aware of, are practically the same as other ETA movements- except when you get to parts like the main plates, or bridges, and ornamental designs. In every likelihood, one never needs parts such as these- but when it happens the manufacturer will take stock of the situation, and probably would want 'in' on the repair prices charged. The possibilities are limited, when you repair, and as my old Boss always said, 'Let common sense prevail'
I'd always say Amen to that...LOL
Prem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jp,<br />
Making common sense of it all, is the challenge s faced by watchmakers in the 21st century! Maurice Lacroix use, to their own advantage of course, modified ETA movements. These, as you are well aware of, are practically the same as other ETA movements- except when you get to parts like the main plates, or bridges, and ornamental designs. In every likelihood, one never needs parts such as these- but when it happens the manufacturer will take stock of the situation, and probably would want &#8216;in&#8217; on the repair prices charged. The possibilities are limited, when you repair, and as my old Boss always said, &#8216;Let common sense prevail&#8217;<br />
I&#8217;d always say Amen to that&#8230;LOL<br />
Prem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/06/25/the-parts-issue-continues/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>I often see broken "parts only" movements on eBay. I guess the stuff you're referring too is unlikely to turn up in such a state, but you never know. At the watchmaking club/school I attend we have a massive collection of broken bits collected over the years - it's not often you can't find a suitable bit. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often see broken &#8220;parts only&#8221; movements on eBay. I guess the stuff you&#8217;re referring too is unlikely to turn up in such a state, but you never know. At the watchmaking club/school I attend we have a massive collection of broken bits collected over the years - it&#8217;s not often you can&#8217;t find a suitable bit. <img src='http://watchmakingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
