<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rolex Parachrom Hairspring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-22948</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-22948</guid>
		<description>Vincent, as far as I can tell the lugs are exactly the same on the GMT-II and the Submariner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent, as far as I can tell the lugs are exactly the same on the GMT-II and the Submariner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-22944</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-22944</guid>
		<description>Please enlighten--
The newest Submariner has had its lugs widened--are these lugs now the same size as the lugs on the newest GMT II, or are they in fact even more substantial. To me, the latest iterations of each model appear to have equally sized lugs. 
Thanks in advance,
Vincent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please enlighten&#8211;<br />
The newest Submariner has had its lugs widened&#8211;are these lugs now the same size as the lugs on the newest GMT II, or are they in fact even more substantial. To me, the latest iterations of each model appear to have equally sized lugs.<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
Vincent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-19715</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-19715</guid>
		<description>Only the Day-Date II has a parachrom hairspring. Rolex will not upgrade. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only the Day-Date II has a parachrom hairspring. Rolex will not upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-19714</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-19714</guid>
		<description>Please answer a question for me. Does my 2004 Day-Date have a Parachrom Blue h/s?  If it does not, will Rolex upgrade to the pbhs when the watch is serviced, or can this be done by reque$t?  Thank You-Vin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please answer a question for me. Does my 2004 Day-Date have a Parachrom Blue h/s?  If it does not, will Rolex upgrade to the pbhs when the watch is serviced, or can this be done by reque$t?  Thank You-Vin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew DeKeyser</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-4421</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew DeKeyser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-4421</guid>
		<description>John, having witnessed the manufacturing process of the parachrom hairspring in person in Geneva, I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blueing process takes place after the hairspring is rolled and pulled through dies to its final shape and coiled and ready to be crimped to a collet and welded to a stud. It is white in color until the blueing process. It is a fully functional hairspring in its white form, the blueing simply protects the hairspring.If you look closely at the video on the Rolex website about the Parachrom, you can see the color of the spring and it is clearly white. And it is more resistant to shocks simply because it is so much thicker than Nivarox springs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, having witnessed the manufacturing process of the parachrom hairspring in person in Geneva, I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blueing process takes place after the hairspring is rolled and pulled through dies to its final shape and coiled and ready to be crimped to a collet and welded to a stud. It is white in color until the blueing process. It is a fully functional hairspring in its white form, the blueing simply protects the hairspring.If you look closely at the video on the Rolex website about the Parachrom, you can see the color of the spring and it is clearly white. And it is more resistant to shocks simply because it is so much thicker than Nivarox springs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tick Talk &#187; More on the Parachrom Hairspring</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Tick Talk &#187; More on the Parachrom Hairspring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>[...] Parachrom hairspring you may want to check out the details of this fabulous development by Rolex in my original post on the topic. Since writing that post I have been patiently waiting to get my hands on a pre-2005 Daytona with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parachrom hairspring you may want to check out the details of this fabulous development by Rolex in my original post on the topic. Since writing that post I have been patiently waiting to get my hands on a pre-2005 Daytona with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Alex, I believe Patek uses a silicon based hairspring which is also resistant to magnetic forces.  Patek&#039;s hairspring was developed at a Swiss University in a joint effort between many different brands, Rolex included.  My understanding is however, that the Parachrom hairspring was developed uniquely by Rolex and is not found in any other watch brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I believe Patek uses a silicon based hairspring which is also resistant to magnetic forces.  Patek&#8217;s hairspring was developed at a Swiss University in a joint effort between many different brands, Rolex included.  My understanding is however, that the Parachrom hairspring was developed uniquely by Rolex and is not found in any other watch brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Uehlinger</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Uehlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>Hello, I appreciated very much this review. Concerning the parachrom spring I wonder if this has not been a joint development together with Patek Philippe? They mount a similar part into their recent models.

Cheers Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I appreciated very much this review. Concerning the parachrom spring I wonder if this has not been a joint development together with Patek Philippe? They mount a similar part into their recent models.</p>
<p>Cheers Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B. Holbrook, II</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Holbrook, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/05/07/rolex-parachrom-hairspring/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I actually spoke with James Dowling in New York about three weeks ago on this very topic, and I&#039;ve been speaking with my contacts at Rolex USA in an attempt to resolve the controversy.  At present, James agrees with me that the non-blue hairsprings found in any 4130 movements ARE NOT Parachrom.  The blue color of the Parachrom hairspring is a direct result of the manufacturing process, and a byproduct of combining two elements to create the Parachrom allow - as soon as the newly formed element hits oxygen, it turns blue.  As he and I understand the manufacturing process, it is physically impossible to have a Parachrom hairspring that isn&#039;t blue.  The most logical explaination here is that the the Parachrom Blu hairspring has not been on the caliber 4130 from the begining as was originally communicated, though I have not received confirmation of this.  I plan on updating my article on www.rolexreferencepage.com once I have a final answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually spoke with James Dowling in New York about three weeks ago on this very topic, and I&#8217;ve been speaking with my contacts at Rolex USA in an attempt to resolve the controversy.  At present, James agrees with me that the non-blue hairsprings found in any 4130 movements ARE NOT Parachrom.  The blue color of the Parachrom hairspring is a direct result of the manufacturing process, and a byproduct of combining two elements to create the Parachrom allow &#8211; as soon as the newly formed element hits oxygen, it turns blue.  As he and I understand the manufacturing process, it is physically impossible to have a Parachrom hairspring that isn&#8217;t blue.  The most logical explaination here is that the the Parachrom Blu hairspring has not been on the caliber 4130 from the begining as was originally communicated, though I have not received confirmation of this.  I plan on updating my article on <a href="http://www.rolexreferencepage.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rolexreferencepage.com</a> once I have a final answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

