<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inequality for Women in Watches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pike</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/comment-page-1/#comment-22065</link>
		<dc:creator>Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/#comment-22065</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anyone will see this comment seeing as I am commenting on a post made over two years ago-- however I have to agree with Ceridwen, it&#039;s difficult to find a ladies&#039; mechanical watch that isn&#039;t overly flashy or otherwise just not-my-style.

I have heard some people say on watch forums that women simply are not interested in the inner workings of a watch, to which I say, well, that can&#039;t be entirely true, since I am a woman who is very much fascinated by the mechanics of it all... and I know I cannot be the only one.

As it stands I usually find myself drawn more toward unisex style watches because so few of the ladies&#039; watches meet my criteria.  That&#039;s how my current one is; it means it&#039;s very large on me but I love it regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone will see this comment seeing as I am commenting on a post made over two years ago&#8211; however I have to agree with Ceridwen, it&#8217;s difficult to find a ladies&#8217; mechanical watch that isn&#8217;t overly flashy or otherwise just not-my-style.</p>
<p>I have heard some people say on watch forums that women simply are not interested in the inner workings of a watch, to which I say, well, that can&#8217;t be entirely true, since I am a woman who is very much fascinated by the mechanics of it all&#8230; and I know I cannot be the only one.</p>
<p>As it stands I usually find myself drawn more toward unisex style watches because so few of the ladies&#8217; watches meet my criteria.  That&#8217;s how my current one is; it means it&#8217;s very large on me but I love it regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceridwen</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceridwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking for a ladies&#039; mechanical and/or automatic watch for ages.  I don&#039;t like battery watches.  They have not performed well for me over the years.  There are far fewer women&#039;s mechanical watches than there are men&#039;s mechanical watches, and the women&#039;s watches are usually silly looking or too expensive.  There are a few Russian or Belarus manufacturers that have some nice women&#039;s watches, but with fixed bracelets rather than the stretch bracelets that used to be so common.  Being slightly larger than a lot of women, I can&#039;t get a fixed 7&quot; bracelet.  It&#039;s frustrating to look for a decent mechanical watch, whether automatic or not.  I think there is definitely a bias against women in these watches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for a ladies&#8217; mechanical and/or automatic watch for ages.  I don&#8217;t like battery watches.  They have not performed well for me over the years.  There are far fewer women&#8217;s mechanical watches than there are men&#8217;s mechanical watches, and the women&#8217;s watches are usually silly looking or too expensive.  There are a few Russian or Belarus manufacturers that have some nice women&#8217;s watches, but with fixed bracelets rather than the stretch bracelets that used to be so common.  Being slightly larger than a lot of women, I can&#8217;t get a fixed 7&#8243; bracelet.  It&#8217;s frustrating to look for a decent mechanical watch, whether automatic or not.  I think there is definitely a bias against women in these watches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saphir - Watch Magazine for Women &#171; Tick Talk</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Saphir - Watch Magazine for Women &#171; Tick Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/07/inequality-for-women-in-watches/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...]   Published February 29, 2008   watches Tags: chanel, watches, women      Not too long ago I wrote about how women just don&#8217;t get the attention that men do from the watch industry. Well here&#8217;s a little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Published February 29, 2008   watches Tags: chanel, watches, women      Not too long ago I wrote about how women just don&#8217;t get the attention that men do from the watch industry. Well here&#8217;s a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

