<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainspring Winders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Safreed</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/comment-page-1/#comment-51299</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Safreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/#comment-51299</guid>
		<description>J. Peter when I was collecting watches I also collected tools&amp;both pocket&amp;wrist watch mainspring winders were part of my collection. However I have seen in a book on watch repair as a hobby by Fletcher-1948 using a pin-vise&amp;mainspring arbor the mainspring could be wound into the mainspring barrel. How do you see this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Peter when I was collecting watches I also collected tools&amp;both pocket&amp;wrist watch mainspring winders were part of my collection. However I have seen in a book on watch repair as a hobby by Fletcher-1948 using a pin-vise&amp;mainspring arbor the mainspring could be wound into the mainspring barrel. How do you see this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Peter</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had any problem finding a correct combination of arbors and barrels to match up with any ETA calibers using the standard Bergeon winder set but you do have to mix and match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had any problem finding a correct combination of arbors and barrels to match up with any ETA calibers using the standard Bergeon winder set but you do have to mix and match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/comment-page-1/#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/02/05/mainspring-winders/#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I am having the same problem with a set of older Watchcraft winders that I purchased awhile back, in that the arbor stem is too large for the ETA 2836-2 spring that I am working on. I was wondering if the regular Bergeon kit like you show would suffice or should I just go ahead and buy the ETA specific kit? 
Thanks
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I am having the same problem with a set of older Watchcraft winders that I purchased awhile back, in that the arbor stem is too large for the ETA 2836-2 spring that I am working on. I was wondering if the regular Bergeon kit like you show would suffice or should I just go ahead and buy the ETA specific kit?<br />
Thanks<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

