<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parts Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prem C</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-11450</link>
		<dc:creator>Prem C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-11450</guid>
		<description>Bonjour Andre!
I didn't see these comments before, better late than never. A tres bientot, j'espere..
Salutations meilleures de la Colombie Britannique,
Prem C
Thanks so much Jp, Jon, facilatating this spare parts comments. Andre and me share the same watchmaking professor from La-Chaux-de-Fonds, ie: Professor Pierre Girardet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonjour Andre!<br />
I didn&#8217;t see these comments before, better late than never. A tres bientot, j&#8217;espere..<br />
Salutations meilleures de la Colombie Britannique,<br />
Prem C<br />
Thanks so much Jp, Jon, facilatating this spare parts comments. Andre and me share the same watchmaking professor from La-Chaux-de-Fonds, ie: Professor Pierre Girardet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakob leitmann</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-7996</link>
		<dc:creator>jakob leitmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-7996</guid>
		<description>For havinng my quartz movement changed of an Audemars Piguet Royal, AP wants more than 2000$.

I just think this is obscene and it shows what they really think about customers.

Any comment would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For havinng my quartz movement changed of an Audemars Piguet Royal, AP wants more than 2000$.</p>
<p>I just think this is obscene and it shows what they really think about customers.</p>
<p>Any comment would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Fleury</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-6277</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Fleury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-6277</guid>
		<description>The Cartier case result at this time:

Mr. Simon and Mr. Spellberg fees were awarded, approximately $1.7 million for as April a recovery of approximately $222,100 in coupons.

Here are some part of Judge Chen document 361:

Judge Chen document 361 states as follows:
"Defendant has agreed to pay up to$2 million in fees, expenses, and incentive award as part of the negotiated settlement. On the other hand it is significant that Defendant has not objected to Counsel's claim for additional fees up to the contracted-for cap of $2 million."

"The preliminary results on redemption response rate of both the consumer and watchmaker subclass are relatively meager." 
"The Court must consider other factor, most notably in this case, the results obtained, which appear relatively meager."
"For the watchmaker subclass, only 91 watchmakers have asked for an application to become a qualified watchmaker and, as of March 4, 2009, only eight applications were actually been sent in. See Mot. 4 (noting that applications may be submitted until June 12, 2009-i.e., for another four months). At the hearing, Settlement Class Counsel provided updated information-i.e., that as of April 1. 2009, the total number of applications sent in was nine. Apparently seven of the applications were preliminarily rejected, leaving only two still under consideration. Defense counsel stated that one of the applications was rejected because the applicant was not a member of the class."
 
"At the hearing, Settlement Class Counsels provided updated information-i.e., that, as of April 1, 2009 the total number of credits redeemed was 2,221."

Note: The consumers received a $100 credit coupon toward a new purchase in any Cartier Boutique.
The total recovery in coupon is therefore as of April 1, 2009: $222,100</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cartier case result at this time:</p>
<p>Mr. Simon and Mr. Spellberg fees were awarded, approximately $1.7 million for as April a recovery of approximately $222,100 in coupons.</p>
<p>Here are some part of Judge Chen document 361:</p>
<p>Judge Chen document 361 states as follows:<br />
&#8220;Defendant has agreed to pay up to$2 million in fees, expenses, and incentive award as part of the negotiated settlement. On the other hand it is significant that Defendant has not objected to Counsel&#8217;s claim for additional fees up to the contracted-for cap of $2 million.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The preliminary results on redemption response rate of both the consumer and watchmaker subclass are relatively meager.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The Court must consider other factor, most notably in this case, the results obtained, which appear relatively meager.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;For the watchmaker subclass, only 91 watchmakers have asked for an application to become a qualified watchmaker and, as of March 4, 2009, only eight applications were actually been sent in. See Mot. 4 (noting that applications may be submitted until June 12, 2009-i.e., for another four months). At the hearing, Settlement Class Counsel provided updated information-i.e., that as of April 1. 2009, the total number of applications sent in was nine. Apparently seven of the applications were preliminarily rejected, leaving only two still under consideration. Defense counsel stated that one of the applications was rejected because the applicant was not a member of the class.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;At the hearing, Settlement Class Counsels provided updated information-i.e., that, as of April 1, 2009 the total number of credits redeemed was 2,221.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note: The consumers received a $100 credit coupon toward a new purchase in any Cartier Boutique.<br />
The total recovery in coupon is therefore as of April 1, 2009: $222,100</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marly</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-5089</link>
		<dc:creator>Marly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-5089</guid>
		<description>You guys do a wonderful job! Keep up the good work!!!t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do a wonderful job! Keep up the good work!!!t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Fleury</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Fleury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet do sell parts to watchmakers.
I am one example and I never attended any training from them.
Rolex requirement for their parts is more than acceptable, one page.

The Cartier/Richemont so called Evaluation Form is 14 pages long and absolutely asbsurd, but approved by the AWCI then president Mr. Warner.

I have to add that the AWCI have not help the watchmakers in the suit for parts availability and damages caused by Cartier's action. On the contrary as seen in the case Fleury V. Richemont.

Andre Fleury
sy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet do sell parts to watchmakers.<br />
I am one example and I never attended any training from them.<br />
Rolex requirement for their parts is more than acceptable, one page.</p>
<p>The Cartier/Richemont so called Evaluation Form is 14 pages long and absolutely asbsurd, but approved by the AWCI then president Mr. Warner.</p>
<p>I have to add that the AWCI have not help the watchmakers in the suit for parts availability and damages caused by Cartier&#8217;s action. On the contrary as seen in the case Fleury V. Richemont.</p>
<p>Andre Fleury<br />
sy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tick Talk &#187; Spare Parts Restrictions</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4822</link>
		<dc:creator>Tick Talk &#187; Spare Parts Restrictions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-4822</guid>
		<description>[...] Parts Availability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parts Availability [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Me &#187; The right to choose your customers.</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Me &#187; The right to choose your customers.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>[...] the other side of the equation, as a watchmaker many watch companies refuse to do business with me (sell me parts) because I don&#8217;t sell their watches, or because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the other side of the equation, as a watchmaker many watch companies refuse to do business with me (sell me parts) because I don&#8217;t sell their watches, or because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clocks and Watches Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Parts Availability</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Clocks and Watches Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Parts Availability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] accepted to be among the finest and most prestigious watch brands and to the b&#8230;    source: Parts Availability, Tick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accepted to be among the finest and most prestigious watch brands and to the b&#8230;    source: Parts Availability, Tick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>There's some very good information and shopping tips at this Google Answers discussion on replacing lost links in the watchband of a Rolex watch:





http://answer.google.com/answers/threadview?id=183725

&lt;a href="http://answer.google.com/answers/threadview?id=183725" rel="nofollow"&gt;Rolex Watchband Replacement Links&lt;/a&gt;





Well worth a look for anyone who's figuring out the best repair and replacement options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some very good information and shopping tips at this Google Answers discussion on replacing lost links in the watchband of a Rolex watch:</p>
<p><a href="http://answer.google.com/answers/threadview?id=183725" rel="nofollow">http://answer.google.com/answers/threadview?id=183725</a></p>
<p><a href="http://answer.google.com/answers/threadview?id=183725" rel="nofollow">Rolex Watchband Replacement Links</a></p>
<p>Well worth a look for anyone who&#8217;s figuring out the best repair and replacement options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rakowski</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rakowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/31/parts-availability/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.



Jason Rakowski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
<p>Jason Rakowski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
