<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: www.clockswatches.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/17/wwwclockswatchescom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/17/wwwclockswatchescom/</link>
	<description>A mechanical watchmaker in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Bure Pocket Watch &#171; Tick Talk</title>
		<link>http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/17/wwwclockswatchescom/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Bure Pocket Watch &#171; Tick Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmakingblog.com/2008/01/17/wwwclockswatchescom/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] dates from the very early 1900s. I didn&#8217;t find a whole lot of information on it at clockswatches.com. All in all it&#8217;s a good watch both for it&#8217;s looks and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dates from the very early 1900s. I didn&#8217;t find a whole lot of information on it at clockswatches.com. All in all it&#8217;s a good watch both for it&#8217;s looks and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

