Skip navigation

Suggestions Post

by J.Peter

Comment here for suggestions

6 Comments

  1. J.Peter
    Posted May 12, 2008 at 7:10 am | Permalink

    Test comment suggestion, make sure this function works.

  2. Ryan
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Hi J. Peter,
    I am currently looking into applying to the Lititz Watch Technicum and I had some questions about the process. I’ve read your blog posts that cover the general application process but I have some more specific questions that I was wondering if you wouldn’t mind answering.
    I would prefer to do this via email so I am hoping that you will read this and get in touch with me.
    Thank you!

  3. Posted May 19, 2008 at 5:39 am | Permalink

    Dear Mr Peter, I have recently acquired a Rotary le0005/06 automatic watch, and an electric winding box with it. I am worried that if I leave my watch turning in the winder every night, the movement will experience unnecessary wear and tear. Am I better off winding it manually, and leaving it motionless, on a table say, overnight? Thanks, T. Sharples.

  4. gigfy
    Posted May 23, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Hello,

    I am a member of the WatchUSeek Chinese mechanicals forum and we have been discussing the origins of the Chinese 6497/98 movements. I believe we have been able to determine the differences between the two manufacturers (Sea-gull and PTS-Hangzhou).

    I believe your fake Panerai started out as a Sea-gull ST36. I would like to think that Sea-gull is doing a better job than that. But what I believe is happening is that unscrupulous watchmakers are buying the movements/ebauches and adding/modifying them to make fakes.

    I understand there are many websites and forums that discuss these Chinese movements only to try and make a better fake. That is not what we are all about.

    While researching these two Chinese movements, I began to wonder, why are they different and what Unitas/ETA calibers they were trying to clone. Unitas 97/98, ETA 97/98, ETA 97/98-1, or ETA 97/98-2.

    I read on the Unitas reference website that they were acquired by ETA in 1983. And that ETA retained the name and calibres for a while. How long did ETA use the U stamp and when did they stop using it? When did they first make the ETA models?

    Thanks,
    gigfy

  5. Posted May 28, 2008 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    I found your report on pin vises informative and would like to followup with a question via direct e-mail to you so I can upload a photo of an item I’ve been looking for. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

  6. Aaron Halverson
    Posted August 10, 2008 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Hey,

    I was referred to you by someone in the Chronometer Club. I was thinking of joining the Chronometer Club and since we’re close to the same age it was suggested I talk to you to get your input on it. If you need more specifics send me an e-mail and we’ll continue this that way. Thanks.

    –Aaron

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*